OMI
March 1998, Vol. 11, No.1
A quarterly dedicated to orthodontic professionals, and to the renewal of their habits and tools by
ORTHO-CYCLE, A COMPANY THROUGH WHICH YOU CAN RECONDITION,
BUY AND SELL ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES.
Editor: Claude G. Matasa, Dr. Chem. Eng., Dr. Techn. Sci., Professor of Oral Bio-Materials

MOVE OVER, MACHIAVELLI !!!
What NBC knew and didn't tell you

 

____NBC's TV "Dateline" program-report on orthodontic recycling of March 9, 1998 had its purpose not to inform but to scare the public. While in appearance it may have looked objective, accepting the obvious, it contained deceptions, half-truths, omissions and innuendos. This report, a year overdue, was probably judged less risky only after the charges brought by the Texas cattlemen against Oprah Winfrey ("U.S. Beef = Mad Cow") were dropped due to a poor interpretation of the First Amendment. Being uncharacteristic of American reporting, it is logical to ask ourselves what are the financial ties between NBC and the trusts behind the Orthodontic Manufacturers Association (OMA), Johnson & Johnson, 3M, Sybron, Tomy, etc.
Deceptions. This was not "The best kept secret of orthodontists", as it was the second attack against braces recycling aired by NBC. The first was in 1990, when David Horowitz, in a "Fight back" broadcast, denounced recycled attachments as a health danger. Since a decade located in a tourist area, Hollywood, South Florida, Ortho-Cycle was never secretive. Being visited by thousands, anybody could see what we were doing. We have our web site on the Internet and we published articles on recycling in American Journal of Orthodontics (July 1989), Journal of General Orthodontics (June 1992) as well as in our ten years old newsletter, "The Orthodontic Materials Insider", formerly "Phoenix without Ashes" sent to over 20,000 readers. In it we have repeatedly presented both the facility and the processing involved (December and March 1997, December and September 1996, March 1994, June 1992, September and December 1990, June and September 1989, December 1987). The issue of December 1990, "You are forcing us to disclose, Mr. Horowitz!" thoroughly described all the steps involved, from adhesive removal, the first decontamination, to the one which is performed prior to shipping: Ask for it!
____How could FDA find out about Ortho-Cycle's recycling from NBC in 1996, when our devices were already FDA accepted in 1991? Was it an attempt to escape the scrutiny of the profession that NBC's broadcast was aired on a national channel a day in advance of the date announced to AAO and by TV-Guide ? Why was it broadcasted the next day only on cable? Addressing itself to the public at large, it didn't give the clinician the opportunity to make response a chance to watch to what he may had to respond.
____An honorable orthodontist, Dr. Douglas D. Durbin, took the brunt of the attack. He was presented as not telling the truth claiming he claimed that he uses now brackets which cannot be recycled. Almost all the brackets made of composites cannot be recycled, as these contain plastic. Some ceramics (e.g. Clarity by 3M) have been even designed against recycling, as their debonding presupposes their collapse.
____NBC's Lea Thompson ended her report claiming "we couldn't find one study which was done on real patients". Again, not true: see Dr. A. Buchwald's article in American Journal of Orthodontics "A three-cycle in vivo evaluation of reconditioned direct-bonding brackets", April 1989.
Half-truths. NBC's crew didn't just happened to be around, but were invited by Ortho-Cycle in the hope that finally they will see de facto how recycling is made and tell the public. This didn't help. Thus, the only view of Ortho-Cycle's autoclaves was presented before the report actually started; an image without a comment. Claude Matasa was presented as "Ortho-Cycle's owner", without any mention of his degrees, conferences and over a hundred scien-tific articles, patents and books. Not one word of his professorship at several universities both in the U.S. and Europe.
Omissions. Out a full day of filming in our facility involving no less than six NBC employees (November 25, 1996), only a short and insignificant clip showing our technicians was given. No mention was made of Ortho-Cycle's staff comprising physicians and engineers. From Dr. Matasa's two-and-a-half hours interview (see "A New Year's gift to the profession", our Newsletter, December 1996), only a short comment was picked up as "useful". It regarded the fact that, in order to avoid open discussions, many orthodontists distance themselves, in public, from recyclers. We have already decried this, a year ago, in our Newsletter in the article "Are the American orthodontists audacious ?"(March 1997).
____No mention was made that we were accepted by FDA in 1991, or that the minute changes we may bring, if any, are well under the tolerances accepted by manufacturers for their new brackets. Not mentioned was the fact that brackets sent by us to clinical labs, using US mail, showed "no bacterial growth isolated, 6 days post inoculation" (Ask for report copies). No mention that the conditions used to break interatomic C-C bonds in polymers would break the same bonds in any living creature.
Biases. If we like it or not, recycling is the way of the future, and should be encouraged, if we want to the future generations to be live a normal life. Stainless steel, dumped in the absence of oxygen in garbage mounds, leaks in our water harmful Ni and Cr ions. It is already unlawful to improperly dispose of Ni-Cd batteries.
____No mention was made that most manufacturers have their brackets made in foreign countries where not only the wages are low by comparison to US, but also the health conditions. No comparison was made with other, less sterilizable armamentarium clinicians currently reuse. If we want to push things as far as giving up introducing in our mouth items which were in contact with other people's mouth, we will have to condemn both silverware and china. There will be no more eating away, or guests invited in our home. We will be reduced to eat only in disposable paper dishes using plastic ware.
____No word about the fact that OMA's letter to orthodon-tists was a flagrant misrepresentation of a thesis presented at the Iowa State University ("The anatomy of a misrepresentation", our Newsletter, December 1996).
____While manufacturers have been brought to justice by clinicians, no such complaint has ever been raised against a recycler. Dr. Donald M. Fox, a diplomate of the American Board of Orthodontics and a recipient of AAO's 1988 Henry Sicher award, has sued TP Orthodontics (Case 3:97CV181, Richmond, VA) as it had to rebrace no less than 225 patients due to new, faulty brackets. The only suit in court a recycler has been exposed to was for... patent infringement ! (Ormco vs. Ortho-Cycle, Case 95-0847, Los Angeles, CA). The case was dropped just before judgment because the plaintiff feared the Sherman's Anti Trust law.
____We showed NBC several articles exposing the many defects found in new brackets or showing that some of the steels used by manufacturers practically dissolve in the mouth: none was mentioned. While manufacturers inspect the brackets "statistically", checking few of the lot, at Ortho-Cycle each bracket is examined five times. As a result, we detected both poor materials and defective brackets, publishing the results in many articles.
Innuendos. NBC's Stone Phillips ended the report with the following "suspense" words: "When Dateline started asking questions, FDA started inspecting recycling parts and... is continuing to review the data".
Conclusion. Judge for yourself. Ask for information, and, if you haven't watched it, we will lend you a copy which will be mailed free of charge to an address in the U.S. (VHS format, NTSC system). We welcome other points of view as well as any comments.

____Dr. Douglas D. Durbin's comments.
"The 'war' inappropriately started and waged by Ormco and others is the lowest form of attack. I believe their offense is destined to be regretted greatly; and that they, someday, will wish they were a leader in environmentally conscious conser-vation of resources and should have initiated bracket recycling/sterilization themselves".

RECONDITIONED ATTACHMENTS WORSE
THAN THE NEW ONES ?
New research should interest you

____In our attempt to exceed FDA's requirements for compliance, in the last few months we focused on the two challenges orthodontic attachment reconditioning offer. The results obtained may surprise you !
Decontamination. Although in the 22 years since we are in business no complaint stating that our attachments posed a danger to health was ever been received, we tried to duplicate what a clinician may receive from us. Using the U.S. mail, we sent to a clinical lab (Micrem Laboratories) two separate batches several series counting hundreds of brackets made of metal and ceramics as well as tubes and bands processed in our standard way. Answering our request, the lab stated that the attachments showed "No bacterial growth isolated, 6 days post inoculation" .
Dimensional stability. Hearing that an advanced and accurate method of measuring slots has been used in Dr. Donald M. Fox's suit against TP Orthodontics, we asked the expert, Dr. M. W. Haller, Jr., to use his court-accepted procedure to measure for us brackets before and after reconditioning through our procedure. The expert agreed, and used for the purpose the advanced "Smart Scope" shown below, which has a nominal accuracy of + .00015" (.004 mm) on all three axes. We followed the expert's instructions and sent him, in separate, numbered bags, twenty brand new brackets which had a distinctive disto-gingival V mark. For the purpose, we selected Ormco Diamond brackets (upper laterals, .022" slot) as these etched marks vanish at the slightest attempt to electro-polish the attachments. On a corner of the mesh base, we applied a dab of adhesive (Concise by 3M). This was done with the purpose to demonstrate, during the re-measuring phase, that the brackets returned were not only the same, but also subjected to our reconditioning process. Given below are his letter and results, as well as our statistical analysis.
____"Dear Dr. Matasa: Previously you had submitted to us a series of new orthodontic brackets for dimensional evaluation. These brackets had a uniform sheen and contained a superficial "V" on the tie-wings. Based upon these characteristics, the brackets were deemed to be new. These brackets were measured, marked with my identifying mark, and returned to you (Reference my memo to you dated 1/29/98). The brackets were then subjected to your recycling procedures and returned to me. Upon receipt, they were carefully examined and, from my carbide scribe marks, positively identified as being the exact same brackets that I had previously measured. It should also be noted that the brackets were initially received with a small bead of hard adhesive having been placed on the pad (or base) of the bracket. This adhesive is removed during the recycling process. This would also help in preventing substitutions.
____The data on the attached page is a compilation of both the original measurements and the re-measurements. It can be seen that the dimensional changes were extremely small. In fact, the average reduction in material thickness was so small that it was less than the repeatability with which an individual measurement could be taken. This situation leads to the fact that some measurements seem to indicate the expected reduction in material thickness due to recycling, while others seem to indicate an increase in material thickness. On average, the in/out bracket thickness was approximately .0002 inches less than the new bracket thickness. Similarly, the slot width at the top of the slot showed an increase of approximately .0002 inches. The slot width at the bottom of the slot (which functionally is the most important dimension of the slot) exhibited a statistically insignificant increase of less than .0001 inches. The new brackets exhibited a range of slot widths (bottom) of .0028 inches. From this I conclude that the changes induced by recycling were dramatically less than the variability allowed in the manufacture of the new brackets. The slot with measurements were taken utilizing a "Smart Scope" manufactured by Optical Gaging Products Corp (see attached photo). The values were generated by aligning the bottom of the slot with the horizontal axis of the scope. Next the cross-hair was lined up to one side of the slot. The x axis of the stage was then zeroed. The stage was moved until the cross-hair lined up with the other side of the slot. At this point, the width could be read directly from the scope monitor. The scope is capable of accuracies of up to + .0002 inches . (See attached spec sheet). In this case there are uncertainties in aligning the cross-hair precisely an in aligning the sample precisely. For this reason the achievable repeatability of the measurements is somewhat greater than +.0002 inches. The instrumentation and measuring methodology were the same as those presented in a suit in court involving the accuracy of slots found in orthodontic brackets in Richmond, VA (Donald M. Fox vs. TP Orthodontics, Case 3:97CV181). The in/out measurements were taken with conventional vernier micrometers. These can be read to the nearest .0001 inch, but again uncertainties due to positioning the bracket prevent that level of accuracy. It is estimated that these values are + .0003 inches. The measurements were obtained by placing a short segment of arch wire into the slot, and then measuring the distance from the top of the arch wire to the center of the concave pad. The average reduction in the in/out dimension was approximately .0002 inches. Similar to the slot width measurement, the maximum in/out dimensional changes from recycling were extremely small compared with the variability observed in new brackets. Based upon my experience in working with orthodontic brackets, and having testified in U.S. Federal Court in matters related to orthodontic brackets, I believe that these dimensional changes are not significant relative to the variability observed in other brackets that I have evaluated. I hope that this information will prove helpful to you. If there are any questions please contact me. Sincerely, Mitchell W. Haller Jr., Ph. D., Assistant Professor of Engineering, Penn State Harrisburg".

Statistical Analysis
___The table below shows the in/out thickness, slot width (bottom) and slot width (top) for each of the twenty brackets used in the experiment, both before and after recycling. The measurements vary from bracket to bracket, whether new or recycled. This natural variability is properly expressed with the help of standard deviation, SD. It is well known in statistics, for the usual bell-shaped type of a distribution (which applies in our case), (a) the interval (mean + or – one standard deviation) contains about 68% of the individual measurement values, and (b) the interval (mean + or – two standard deviations) contains about 95% of the individual measurement values.
___A statistical analysis of the data presented shows that:
(A) The standard deviations of the in and out thickness of the twenty new and recycled brackets are .00944037 and .00950371", respectively, which amounts to an increase + D of .00006334", i.e. of .67% in the standard deviation, (B). The standard deviations of the slot width (top) of the twenty new and recycled brackets are .00093053" and .00090349", respectively, i.e. a decrease of .00002704" or 2.9% in the standard deviation. (C) The standard deviations of the slot width at its bottom, the most sensitive dimension, is .02237", and its standard deviation is .00080662". In other words, about 68% of the individual sample values will be contained within the interval from .02156 (mean – one standard deviation = .02237 –.00081) to .02318 (mean + one standard deviation = .02237 + .00081). Actually 14 out of the 20 values (some 70%) lie within this interval. Also, compare the width of this interval showing the variation of individual bracket measurements of .0016200" (.02318" –.02156") with the value of the decrease of .0000008" in the standard deviation for the recycled brackets measurements. For all measurements, and whether an increase or a decrease, the difference between the sample standard deviations of the measurements on the new or recycled brackets, is insignificantly low, well within what one would expect to find as a difference in the values of standard deviations within new brackets. As a matter of fact, in two out of three cases (slot width, bottom and top), the standard deviations for the recycled brackets are smaller than those of the corresponding new ones. Because in all cases this difference is negligibly small, it is obvious that the variation between the measurements of the brackets (as measured by the standard deviation) is not affected by recycling.


 

Previous Issues
April 2008
*Accelerated aging, a dream?
*Sometimes, dreams can come true.
December2007
*Celebrating 20 years of contributions to the science of orthodontic materials.
*A self-ligation mania?
*Corrosion and self-ligating brackets.
*Materials in self-ligating brackets, yesterday and today.
June 2007
*“Shear-peel”, peel, tension, torsion or cleavage: Which one works better for you?
*Modeling mechanic debonding with the help of the Velcro™ fastener.
June 2007
*“Shear-peel”, peel, tension, torsion or cleavage: Which one works better for you?
*Modeling mechanic debonding with the help of the Velcro™ fastener.
March 2007
* The bad news: those who handle orthodontic sealants, adhesives and restoratives are exposed to cancer.
The good news: with the modern means of today, sometimes it can be cured.
*“Cyano-” doesn’t always kill you! A case in point: the cyanoacrylates.
*Cyanoacrylate primers, a way to better bonds?
2006
Mar | Jun | Sept | Dec
2005
Mar | Jun | Sept | Dec
2004
Mar | Jun | Sept | Dec
2003
Mar | Jun | Sept | Dec
2002
Mar | Jun | Sept | Dec
2001
Mar | Jun | Sept | Dec
2000
Mar | Jun | Sept | Dec
1999
Mar | Jun | Sept | Dec
1998
Mar | Jun | Sept | Dec
1997
Mar | Jun | Sept | Dec
1996
Mar | Jun | Sept | Dec
1995
Mar | Jun | Sept | Dec
1994
Mar | Jun | Sept | Dec
1993
Mar | Jun | Sept | Dec
1992
Mar | Jun | Sept | Dec
1991
Mar | Jun | Sept | Dec
1990
Mar | Jun | Sept | Dec
1989
Mar | Jun | Sept | Dec
1988
Mar | Jun | Sept | Dec
1987
Mar | Jun | Sept | Dec
Scientific Posters
posters
Links
UIC Department of Orthodontics
-------------------------
AJO
-------------------------
World Journal of Orthodontics
-------------------------
Journal of Clinical Orthodontics
------------------------
The Angle Orthodontist
Ortho-Cycle Co., Inc.
A company which cleans, inspects, sorts and decontaminates orthodontic appliances, as well as buys and sells them.
Dr. Claude Matasa
1507 Hollywood Blvd.
Hollywood, FL 33020
E-Mail: Matasa@aol.com
Fax: 954/921-4174



THE FIRST ANTIMICROBIAL ACRYLIC RESIN
IS ON THE MARKET
Six years ago, we showed that both adhesives and bracket pads are attacked by microbes, but can be
“immunized” against them.

 

____ Remember such striking photographs? Some were shown in 1992 in two successive issues of our "Phoenix Without Ashes" 1,2 while others were published both in Europe3,4 and in the U.S.5,6. All vividly show the effect of microorganisms on both adhesives and stainless steel attachments. The finding struck a cord even with the National Association of Corrosion Engineers who asked for an article on it. At that time, we suggested to stop such attacks by "immunizing" the adhesives by the addition of antimicrobial agents such as quaternary ammonium salts. Maquat (a commercial bactericide made by Mason Chemicals, Chicago, IL, described to be a 80% solution of N-alkyl dimethyl benzyl ammonium chloride), has been found by us to inhibit the growth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa when added to the adhesive1. It took, however, six years till the first commercial antimicrobial acrylic resin (containing a similar quaternary ammonium salt described as "benzalkonium chloride") was launched both in Europe and the US by an Italian company (Sintodent, Bandini, Rome).
Short history
___ In 1867, the Scott surgeon Joseph Lister published his fundamental article in Lancet (where he paid tribute to Louis Pasteur) on the use of carbolic acid (phenol) to kill germs. Nine years after Lister's publication, Samuel Gross, a reputed leader of the American surgeons, wrote "Little if any faith is placed by any enlightened or experienced surgeon on this side of the Atlantic in the so-called carbolic treatment of Professor Lister"8.
____Soon, European surgeons recognized the part played by bacteria in infections and "Listerism" started to be widely applied. In dentistry, the action of the microorganisms accumulating on composites has been analyzed relatively late. Far from contributing only to periodontal disease and secondary caries, these were found to cause the deterioration of the material 9-11. Believed till recently to be due to the enzymes found in saliva12, the alteration of some restorative composites and glass ionomers has been successfully proven and then duplicated in vitro using Pseudomonas aeruginosa13,11. To protect from infection those handling alginate impressions14 as well those wearing prostheses15,16 or elastic linings covering the periodontal surgical sites17, antimicrobial agents have been added to the corresponding products.
____The agents used (quaternary ammonium salts and chlorhexidine derivatives) were found to be effective in stopping the attack if added up to 0.5% in weight.
____In orthodontics, both the phenomenon and the procedure seem to have been ignored. During the years, in several conferences on the adhesive attacks at meetings held both in the U.S. and abroad addressed to specialized clinicians, each time the attendees were caught by surprise viewing slides showing the effects of microorganisms on acrylic composites and stainless steel.
The recently launched antimicrobial resin
___ The new commercially released self-curing acrylic resin acrylic has been optimized to avoid gingival inflammations while relining or creating temporary bridges. According to the manufacturer, such inflammations usually take place during the preparation phase of abutment teeth and are due to the accumulation of plaque bacteria found on the margins of temporary prosthesis. The invention is protected by an international patent and has obtained the CE (European quality mark) certification7. The related studies have been presented in Italy18, 19, US20 and in 1998 in France21.The thrust of the research performed by the staff of the University of Ancona has been to demonstrate first that the new formulation presents indeed an antimicrobial activity21, and that the modifications brought to a traditional product does not affect its thermal or mechanical properties19,20. No growth of bacteria (among which Streptococcus mutans) was observed on the specimens containing benzalkonium chloride, while bacteria grew on all the control samples21. The mechanical properties of the antimicrobial resin, such as hardness, tensile strength and compression were practically unaffected20: the exothermal effect resulting from the resin polymerization did not exceed the limit threshold of 40oC 19 above which pulpal damage may occur.
____Quaternary ammonium salts (or quats) are usually made from tertiary amines and alkyl chlorides, in the presence of enough sodium hydroxide to capture the Cl- ions. As secondary and tertiary aromatic amines are too weak bases, only the primary aromatic amines can be alkylated:
C6H5-CH2-NH2+3CH3Cl+2NaOH = [C6H5-CH2-N+(CH3)3]Cl- + 2NaCl+ 2H20
____Benzalkonium chloride is a generic name for mixtures known as Benirol; BTC; Capitol; Cequartyl; Drapolene; Drapolex; Enuclen; Germinol, Germitol; Paralkan; Rodalon; Zephiran chloride. Structurally, the mixture of alkyl-dimethyl-benzyl-ammonium chlorides has the following general formula, in which R represents a mixture of alkyls from C8H17 to C18H3722. White, amorphous powders with a bitter taste, quats can have various solubilities according to the length of the radical R. Their toxicity is similar to that of stannous (Sn2+) fluoride, a common ingredient in tooth pastes (LD50 orally in rats: 400mg/kg22). This allows their use as pharmaceutical preservatives and antiseptics.
Possible applications in dentistry.
Prostheses. At a conference concerning the effect of microbes on adhesives, a listener removed and showed us his prosthesis which was affected by some "strange phenomenon" he could only now understand. Indeed, the resemblance between the shape and structure of the affected zone with these exhibited by microbe-attacked adhesives found on used direct bonding brackets is obvious, Fig. 3. In our opinion, all acrylic prostheses and not only the temporary bridges should be made of antimicrobials-containing acrylates.
Restoratives. As many restoratives are based today on acrylic composites, having thus a matrix which is vulnerable, the addition of antimicrobials will lengthen considerably the life of the restorations. Indeed, a composite which after years of wear did not properly fill the cavity was removed and a portion was presented to us for examination. Seen under magnification, it showed both the familiar yellowish discoloration and the specific surface alterations (pores and partly depolymerized structure) found on the microbe-attacked adhesives used in direct bonding, Fig. 4.
____We strongly believe that if acrylic composites used as restoratives would be added with tiny amounts of adequate antimicrobials, their life will be significantly increased. Microbes penetrate and seep through micro-cracks along the interface composite-dentin, consuming both. The microcracks are gradually enlarged, allowing more and more microbes to enter and develop. After a while, the restoration becomes lose and has to be replaced, and the cycle continues till the tooth involved ends under a crown.
Applications in orthodontics.
____Six years ago, we revealed the microbial attacks on adhesive and on steel direct- bonding attachments. To stop these, we used Maquat from Mason Chemical, Chicago, a quat belonging to the same family as the one used by Sintodent. Unfortunately, no orthodontic sealants or adhesives containing antimicrobial agents are yet available. This is regrettable, as the examination of debonded direct bonding brackets shows that while bracket bases are seldom attacked, typical alterations of the adhesive are the norm rather than the exception. Those due to aerobic microorganisms are easy to observe, exhibiting dark spots with definite contours. ____This type of attack is less common than that due to anaerobic microorganisms which generate a rather subtle, but more deleterious change of the adhesive at its interface with the enamel. This translates in a weakening of the neck of the adhesive sheaths (or tags) which determine bond strength23. If the thickness of these necks is substantially diminished, the depth of the sheaths (or tags) becomes unimportant as shown in Fig. 5, leading to bond failure as sketched in Fig. 6.
____This explains why some attachments, which have withstood wear for years, debond just before the treatment's end. This is not due to an excessive stress inflicted upon the attachments, but to the continuous degradation of the adhesive caused by microorganisms. To evidence the alteration produced by anaerobes, staining agents such as methylene blue can be used. In Fig. 7 are shown two views of the same batch of used brackets, one before staining and the other after immersion in a 2% ethanol solution of methylene blue.
The bases of stainless steel brackets are likewise, but not often, it is true, attacked by iron-consuming bacteria. As this attack occurs simultaneously with an alteration of the adhesive, as shown in Fig. 8, this leads to a weakening of both the bond and the attachment.
____Before publishing our findings, Professor T. M. Graber, editor-in-chief of the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofac. Orthopedics, was asked for advice if these should be patented or not. In his letter to us dated April 15, 1992, he considered the reported "microorganisms effect to be very important", and added "Knowing the trials and tribulations of getting a patent and having it stolen right away anyway, I would urge you to publish rather than patent, and wait and have it taken from you in any event... If you could write an article about some other views showing the corrosion in the crevices made by the plaque, the undercuts on the bonding material, etc., I believe that this would be of value because I don't think that many of our clinicians understand what is happening".
____Following his advice, we didn't apply for a patent, but presented the manuscript for publication in American J. Orthodontics5. While getting and especially enforcing a patent on antibacterial orthodontic adhesives may have been be quite difficult, the usefulness of such products is indubitable.
Aren't we too slow in accepting the obvious ?
____Our mouths have the less enviable distinction to host an incredibly abundant microbial flora which comprises species which are both typical and "opportunist" (found there only by chance). Recently, at least two companies have launched antimicrobial tooth pastes (Cool Mint ListerineR by Warner Lambert Consumer Health Care, and BiotheneR by Laclede Professional Products). Road signs abound in S. Florida boasting that "there are more germs on your teeth than:... "on the gum stuck to that guy's shoe", "in the back of your car", or "on the bottom of your trash can", etc. (see further). In industry, the addition of antimicrobial ingredients is compulsory even in chlorinated polymers such as polyvinyl chloride. Indeed, despite its high content in chlorine, PVC is readily attacked by various microbes and fungi. Applications of polymers containing anti microbials include flooring, garden hose, pool liners, wall coverings. "Without antimicrobials, polymers can experience surface growths, cause allergic reactions, unpleasant odors, staining, embrittlement and premature product failure"24.
____While some bactericides used in coatings and films are safe, nonirritating and non-sensitizing at the recommended use levels (such as Nuodex 100-VT25, a quaternary ammonium salt similar to these used in our experiments as in Sintodent), most antimicrobials used in industry are by far more potent. Thus, products such Micro-Check 11 (Ferro Corporation and Vinyzene IT (Morton International) contain isothiazoline (i.e. a compound containing sulfur), while 10-16-oxybisphenoxy arsine, known as OBPA (Akzo Chemicals), contains arsenic. The recommended loading levels range between 0.6% and 3%. Most antimicrobials are carried in plasticizers, which are highly mobile and migrate throughout the end product: if a significant leaching occurs, the product is left unprotected. In the US, under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, manufacturers of antimicrobial additives must pass stringent tests to prove efficacy data. Isn't it strange that the plastics we are surrounded with are protected, while these subjected to by far stronger microbial attacks, these occurring in the favorable warm, moist and rich in food environment which is the human mouth, are not ?
____Since decades it is now known that stainless steels are attacked by microbes. There are many bacteria which need iron in their metabolisms, as we do it for our blood haemoglobin. Some accelerate the oxidation of Fe to Fe2+ and then to Fe3+, depleting in oxygen the metal surface. Stainless steels, which are precisely protected against corrosion by a thin oxide layer (Cr2O3) can then be attacked like any common steel. Other commonly encountered microorganisms are sulfate reducers, such as Desulfovibrio desulfuricans, sulfur oxidixers, such as Thiobaccilus Ferrooxidans, Beggiatoa and Thiotrix or slime forming such as Aerobacter, Flavobacterium and some of the Pseudomonas species26.

____Among the microorganisms associated with iron, Ferribaccilus and Gallionella are believed to be true iron bacteria, while Crenotrix and Leptotrix are facultative autotrophs. As all of these are found in water supplies, stainless steel pipes and tanks are found quite often to be perforated. Thus, on a basic stainless steel used both in bracket manufacture and tank construction, AISI 304 , sulfate reducers are causing conical, while iron bacteria produce both conical and spherical pits26. (See similar pits on the bracket base shown in Fig. 8). Before understanding the phenomena involved, attempts to replace common steel with stainless steel in various constructions destined to be in contact with natural water have led to even greater problems 26, 27.
Is it feasible to add antimicrobials to adhesives ?
___The answer is undoubtedly yes. The polymerization initiation system of the self-curing adhesives is chemically compatible, already containing as accelerators aromatic amines related to the quaternary ammonium salts used as antibacterial both by us and the manufacturers of Sintodent. In addition, the amount needed is practically insignificant, when compared with some 70% inert filler commonly used. As the additive doesn't have to exceed 1%, it barely influences mechanical properties. The substituting alkyl radicals control its solubility.
____Interestingly enough, the tertiary amines used as accelerators [N, N-dimethyl-p-toluidine, N, N-bis (2 hydroxy-ethyl)-p-toluidine] do not seem to exhibit an antibacterial activity: our experiments using the first amine showed that the growth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa incubated for 48 h at 100oF was not deterred within a week5.
Conclusion
___ Sooner or later, the manufacturers of all acrylic prostheses and baseplates, as well as orthodontic adhesives and sealants, will follow the lead of Bandini, the Italian manufacturer who launched the first commercial antimicrobial acrylic resin destined for oral use. Extensively used in the plastics and coatings industry, where the exposure to microbes is not as great, antimicrobials should be widely used to help acrylic matrices to withstand microbial attacks, and in the case of orthodontics, reduce premature debondings and protect baseplates.
____More important, the addition of antimicrobials to restoratives will considerably prolong the life of restorations, perhaps completely avoiding their repeated replacement.

References
1. Matasa CG, You heard it here first ! Your bonds may decay without your knowledge. Phoenix Without Ashes, 1992;(3): 2-7
2. Matasa CG, You heard it here first (again). Microbes feed on your stainless steel attachments. Phoenix Without Ashes, 1992; 5(4): 3-7
3. Matasa CG, Stainless steels and direct-bonding brackets, III. Microbiological properties (in German), Informationen aus Orthod. u. Kieferorthop., (Heidelberg), 1993; 26(3) 269-273
4. Matasa CG, La corrosion des verrous: un defi pour l'orthodontiste (in French), Actualites Odonto-Stoma-tologiques (France) September, nr. 187, p.401-409, 1994
5. Matasa CG, Microbial attack of orthodontic adhesives, Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 1995; 108:132-41
6. Matasa CG, Orthodontic attachment corrosion susceptibilities, J. Clin. Orthod. 1995; 29(1): 16-23
7. Sintodent, Letter to concessionaires, dealers or exclusivists, Internet (baldo@bec.it), January 21, 1998
8. Lyons AS, Infection. In Medicine, an illustrated history, Lyons AS, Petrucelli RJ ed., Abradale Press, Harry Abrams Inc., NY 1987
9. Loe H, Reaction of marginal periodontal tissues to restorative procedure, Int. Dent. J. 1967; 18: 759-778
10 Karlsen K, Gingival reaction of dental restorations, Acta Odontol. Scan. 1970; 28: 895-904
11. Valderhaug J, Periodontal conditions and carious lesions following the insertion of fixed prosthesis, Int. Dent. J. 1980; 30; 298-304
12. Herczegh A, Gyarmati I, Nasz I, Banoczy J, Study on the bacterium-resistance of certain types of photo-polymerizable filling materials and glass ionomer products, (in Hungarian), Fogorvosi Szemle 1991; 84: 151-4
13. Freund M, Munksgaard EC, Enzymic hydrolysis of (di) methacrylates and their polymers, Scand J. Dent. Res. 1990; 3: 261-5
14. Tyler R, Tobias RS, Ayliffe GAJ, Browne RM, An in vitro study of the antiviral properties of an alginate impression material impregnated with disinfectant, J. Dent. Res. 1989;17: 137-139
15. Imazato S, Kawakami M, Torii, M, Tsuchitani Y, Antibacterial activity of composites containing chemically bound non- releasing antibacterial compound, J. Dent. Res.71 (IADR Abtracts) 1992 # 1647
16. Imazato S, Mc Cabe JF, Influence of incorporation of anti-bacterial monomer on curing behavior of a dental composite, J. Dent. Res. 1994; 73(10): 1641-1645
17. Stambaugh K, Hare P, Barricaid TM with 0.5% chlorhexidine diacetate; antimicrobial and physical properties, J. Dent. Res. 69 (IADR Abtracts) 1990# 969
18. Albergo G, Mechanical characteristics of a new acrylic resin preliminary results. Published in Records of the (Italian) National SIDOC Congress of Capri, October 1996
19. Albergo G, Observations on the thermal behavior of several methacrylic resins during polymerization. Published in Records of the (Italian) National SIDOC Congress of Capri, October 1996
20. Albergo G. Accarisi E, Sampalmieri F, Bedini R, Andreana S, Effect of antimicrobial ingredients on mechanical performance in acrylic resins, IADR Abstract, 1997, Orlando, USA
21. Cappeli M, Albergo G, Casolary L, Sampalmieri F, Furore G, Antibacterial activity of a resin: a qualitative study, IADR Abstract, 1997, Nice, France
22. The Merck Index, 12th ed., 1996, Budavary S, editor, Merck & Co. Whitehouse Station, NJ
23. Guan G, Asai Y, Matasa CG, Hattori T, Mitani S. Bond strength as a function of enamel -adhesive interface, in press (Ortodontia e Ortopedia Maxilar, Brazil)
24. Reilly CJ, Vital ingredients aid processability, performance and appearance, Modern plastics, Mid-November 1994, C3-C9.
25. Tenneco, US Patent 2,519,294, 1970
26.Tatnall RE, Microbiologically influenced corrosion, Materials performance, 1981; 20(9): 32-40
27. Pope DH, Stoecker JG, Microbiologically influenced corrosion, in: Process Industries Corrosion, National Assoc. of Corrosion Engineers, Houston, 1986.

SEE US AT THE 98TH AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF ORTHODONTISTS
ANNUAL SESSION IN DALLAS, BOOTH 140